Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 3 Sep 2002 10:36:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 3 Sep 2002 10:36:51 -0400 Received: from smtpzilla2.xs4all.nl ([194.109.127.138]:28938 "EHLO smtpzilla2.xs4all.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 3 Sep 2002 10:36:51 -0400 Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 16:41:01 +0200 From: Jurriaan To: Jan Kasprzak Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: RAID5 checksum algorithm selection Message-ID: <20020903144101.GA20593@middle.of.nowhere> Reply-To: thunder7@xs4all.nl References: <20020903161846.J18187@fi.muni.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020903161846.J18187@fi.muni.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Message-Flag: Still using Outlook? Please Upgrade to real software! Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 776 Lines: 22 From: Jan Kasprzak Date: Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 04:18:46PM +0200 > > Why does the kernel decide to use the pIII_sse function, > even though the p5_mmx is faster? > > The kernel is 2.4.20-pre5-ac1. > Try the source, there's a comment at the end of include/i386/xor.h that explains (not in great detail, but perhaps google or another archive can help there?). Good luck, Jurriaan -- Intel - they couldn't spell intelligent! GNU/Linux 2.4.20-pre4-ac2 SMP/ReiserFS 2x1402 bogomips load av: 0.08 0.06 0.07 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/