Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 3 Sep 2002 11:09:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 3 Sep 2002 11:09:09 -0400 Received: from perninha.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.156]:15889 "HELO perninha.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 3 Sep 2002 11:09:04 -0400 Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 12:13:27 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@duckman.distro.conectiva To: "Peter T. Breuer" Cc: linux kernel Subject: Re: [RFC] mount flag "direct" In-Reply-To: <200209031501.g83F1Oa31142@oboe.it.uc3m.es> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 997 Lines: 34 On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Peter T. Breuer wrote: > Rationale: > No caching means that each kernel doesn't go off with its own idea of > what is on the disk in a file, at least. Dunno about directories and > metadata. And what if they both allocate the same disk block to another file, simultaneously ? A mount option isn't enough to achieve your goal. It looks like you want GFS or OCFS. Info about GFS can be found at: http://www.opengfs.org/ http://www.sistina.com/ (commercial GFS) Dunno where Oracle's cluster fs is documented. regards, Rik -- http://www.linuxsymposium.org/2002/ "You're one of those condescending OLS attendants" "Here's a nickle kid. Go buy yourself a real t-shirt" http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/