Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932083Ab2JRKuN (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Oct 2012 06:50:13 -0400 Received: from smtp.eu.citrix.com ([62.200.22.115]:8055 "EHLO SMTP.EU.CITRIX.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754926Ab2JRKuL (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Oct 2012 06:50:11 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,606,1344211200"; d="scan'208";a="15251311" Message-ID: <1350557371.2460.117.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V3 4/6]: PVH:bootup and setup related changes. From: Ian Campbell To: Mukesh Rathor CC: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , "Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 11:49:31 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20121017173223.7ea1901d@mantra.us.oracle.com> References: <20121017173223.7ea1901d@mantra.us.oracle.com> Organization: Citrix Systems, Inc. Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.3-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 740 Lines: 22 On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 01:32 +0100, Mukesh Rathor wrote: > > + /* PVH TBD/FIXME: vcpu info placement in phase 2 */ > + if (xen_pvh_domain()) > + return; Do you have a list of future work before PVH is "feature complete" somewhere? I wouldn't count vcpu placement specifically against completeness but the TBD triggered the thought. For example I was reviewing a migration patch this morning and was wondering if that sort of thing had been investigated yet. Ian. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/