Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 3 Sep 2002 14:48:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 3 Sep 2002 14:48:24 -0400 Received: from gate.in-addr.de ([212.8.193.158]:4877 "HELO mx.in-addr.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 3 Sep 2002 14:48:23 -0400 Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 20:53:44 +0200 From: Lars Marowsky-Bree To: "Peter T. Breuer" , root@chaos.analogic.com Cc: Rik van Riel , linux kernel Subject: Re: [RFC] mount flag "direct" (fwd) Message-ID: <20020903185344.GA7836@marowsky-bree.de> References: <200209031629.g83GT2e08075@oboe.it.uc3m.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <200209031629.g83GT2e08075@oboe.it.uc3m.es> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Ctuhulu: HASTUR Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1047 Lines: 35 On 2002-09-03T18:29:02, "Peter T. Breuer" said: > > Lets say you have a perfect locking mechanism, a fake SCSI layer > OK. BTW, I would like to see your perfect distributed locking mechanism. > The directory entry would ceryainly have to be reread after a write > operation on disk that touched it - or more simply, the directory entry > would hvae to be reread every time it were needed, i.e. be uncached. *ouch* Sure. Right. You just have to read it from scratch every time. How would you make readdir work? > If that presently is not possible, then I would like to think about > making it possible. Just please, tell us why. Sincerely, Lars Marowsky-Br?e -- Immortality is an adequate definition of high availability for me. --- Gregory F. Pfister - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/