Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 07:55:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 07:55:38 -0500 Received: from [195.63.194.11] ([195.63.194.11]:45575 "EHLO mail.stock-world.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 07:55:27 -0500 Message-ID: <39FD7C4F.74D8DCCC@evision-ventures.com> Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 14:49:03 +0100 From: Martin Dalecki X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16-1 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Samuelson CC: Linux Kernel Developer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Recommended compiler? - Re: [patch] kernel/module.c (plus gratuitous rant) In-Reply-To: <4309.972694843@ocs3.ocs-net> <20001029232347.D4EB081F9@halfway.linuxcare.com.au> <20001030050821.B9175@wire.cadcamlab.org> <20001030055859.C9175@wire.cadcamlab.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Peter Samuelson wrote: > > > So which is the recommended compiler for each kernel version 2.2.x, > > 2.4.x(pre?) nowadays? > > * 2.91.66 aka egcs 1.1.2. It has been officially blessed for 2.4 and > has been given an informal thumbs-up by Alan for 2.2. (It does NOT > work for 2.0, if you still care about that.) > > * 2.7.2.3 works for 2.2 (and 2.0) but NOT for 2.4. > > * 2.95.2 seems to work with both 2.2 and 2.4 (no known bugs, AFAIK) and > many of us use it, but it is a little riskier than egcs. > > * Red Hat "2.96" or CVS 2.97 will probably break any known kernel. Works fine for me and 2.4.0-test10-pre5... however there are tons of preprocessor warnings in some drivers. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/