Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758080Ab2JSJnW (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Oct 2012 05:43:22 -0400 Received: from eu1sys200aog106.obsmtp.com ([207.126.144.121]:39069 "EHLO eu1sys200aog106.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757806Ab2JSJnU (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Oct 2012 05:43:20 -0400 Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 15:13:09 +0530 From: Shiraz Hashim To: viresh kumar Cc: , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] pwm: add spear pwm driver support Message-ID: <20121019094308.GC4185@localhost.localdomain> References: <1350559712-8514-1-git-send-email-shiraz.hashim@st.com> <20121019055943.GA4185@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3427 Lines: 107 Hi Viresh, On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 12:23:08PM +0530, viresh kumar wrote: > On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Shiraz Hashim wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:11:06PM +0530, viresh kumar wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Shiraz Hashim wrote: > > >> > +static int __devexit spear_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > >> > +{ > >> > + struct spear_pwm_chip *pc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > >> > + int i; > >> > + > >> > + if (WARN_ON(!pc)) > >> > + return -ENODEV; > >> > + > >> > + for (i = 0; i < NUM_PWM; i++) { > >> > + struct pwm_device *pwmd = &pc->chip.pwms[i]; > >> > + > >> > + if (!test_bit(PWMF_ENABLED, &pwmd->flags)) > > One point here: If i am not wrong you want to disable pwmd if it is enabled. > Shouldn't you check for if (test_bit(PWMF_ENABLED, &pwmd->flags)) instead? > You are right. The code is un-necessarily disabling all pwms while trying to enable the clock for those which are not enabled also. > >> > + if (clk_prepare_enable(pc->clk) < 0) > >> > + continue; > >> > + > >> > + spear_pwm_writel(pc, i, PWMCR, 0); > >> > + clk_disable_unprepare(pc->clk); > >> > + } > >> > >> You are enabling/disabling clock N times here and each of these will > >> write to an register. Do something better. > >> > > > > I need to shut down all active pwms, how else would you suggest that ? > > Sorry, i misread the code on the second go :( > > I am proposing something like: > > static int __devexit spear_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > { > struct spear_pwm_chip *pc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > int i, clk_enabled = 0; > > if (WARN_ON(!pc)) > return -ENODEV; > > for (i = 0; i < NUM_PWM; i++) { > struct pwm_device *pwmd = &pc->chip.pwms[i]; > > if (!test_bit(PWMF_ENABLED, &pwmd->flags) && !clk_enabled) > if (clk_prepare_enable(pc->clk) < 0) > continue; > else > clk_enabled++; > > spear_pwm_writel(pc, i, PWMCR, 0); > } > > if (clk_enabled) > clk_disable_unprepare(pc->clk); > ... > } It may not be required as pwms which are not enabled do not have their clocks enabled. Hence, perhaps we can do following, 8<--------------------------- static int spear_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) { struct spear_pwm_chip *pc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); int i; if (WARN_ON(!pc)) return -ENODEV; for (i = 0; i < NUM_PWM; i++) { struct pwm_device *pwm = &pc->chip.pwms[i]; if (test_bit(PWMF_ENABLED, &pwm->flags)) { spear_pwm_writel(pc, i, PWMCR, 0); clk_disable(pc->clk); } } /* clk was prepared in probe, hence unprepare it here */ clk_unprepare(pc->clk); return pwmchip_remove(&pc->chip); } ---------------------------->8 -- regards Shiraz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/