Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759425Ab2JSQ0E (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Oct 2012 12:26:04 -0400 Received: from mho-04-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.74]:20410 "EHLO mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759409Ab2JSQ0B (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Oct 2012 12:26:01 -0400 X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn X-Originating-IP: 72.84.113.162 X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX18LoS95bdTbTbAhLIRszBN3FjhM0oPAVHg= Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 12:25:08 -0400 From: Jason Cooper To: Krzysztof Halasa Cc: Arnd Bergmann , arm@kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , lkml , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PULL REQ] IXP4xx changes for Linux 3.7 Message-ID: <20121019162508.GJ14395@titan.lakedaemon.net> References: <201210142002.55841.arnd@arndb.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1689 Lines: 38 On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:01:17AM +0200, Krzysztof Halasa wrote: ... > Unfortunately, as I already explained to you in > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/29/37, my resources for IXP4xx are very > limited (and this isn't a paid job) and I'm in no way able to do what > you require. This, coupled with my inability to make the patches end > up upstream any other way, will make me post relevant MAINTAINERS > changes shortly. > > Don't get me wrong. If I had time for this it could be different. > Unfortunately IXP4xx is a legacy arch, and for me it's simply a hobby > at this point. Given the raised barriers to participate, probably > aimed at paid maintainers, I have to quit doing this. Krzysztof, please reconsider. I'm also a hobbyist maintainer (kirkwood,orion5x,mv78xx0,dove,mvebu). I'd hate to see the community lose a valuable maintainer because arch/arm/ has grown so much. If you would like, I could pull your patches through my tree and send them on to arm-soc. I'm already familiar with arm-soc process, and I'll admit I have a soft spot for mach-ixp4xx. It was my first experience with embedded Linux (nslu2, gateworks boards). This way, you could see the process first hand without having to do the labor. We could do this for a few release cycles so you can see how it goes. After that, we can reassess things. If you still don't wish to lend your experience, so be it. But I hope we can change your mind. thx, Jason. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/