Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932926Ab2JSQ27 (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Oct 2012 12:28:59 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([193.178.161.156]:55397 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758015Ab2JSQ24 (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Oct 2012 12:28:56 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: wency@cn.fujitsu.com Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, liuj97@gmail.com, len.brown@intel.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com, muneda.takahiro@jp.fujitsu.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] acpi,memory-hotplug : implement framework for hot removing memory Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 18:32:42 +0200 Message-ID: <10485269.ao9A69hu9S@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.8.5 (Linux/3.6.2-6-desktop; KDE/4.8.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1350641040-19434-1-git-send-email-wency@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <1350641040-19434-1-git-send-email-wency@cn.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2257 Lines: 61 On Friday 19 of October 2012 18:03:57 wency@cn.fujitsu.com wrote: > From: Wen Congyang > > The patch-set implements a framework for hot removing memory. > > The memory device can be removed by 2 ways: > 1. send eject request by SCI > 2. echo 1 >/sys/bus/pci/devices/PNP0C80:XX/eject > > In the 1st case, acpi_memory_disable_device() will be called. > In the 2nd case, acpi_memory_device_remove() will be called. > acpi_memory_device_remove() will also be called when we unbind the > memory device from the driver acpi_memhotplug or a driver initialization > fails. > > acpi_memory_disable_device() has already implemented a code which > offlines memory and releases acpi_memory_info struct . But > acpi_memory_device_remove() has not implemented it yet. > > So the patch prepares the framework for hot removing memory and > adds the framework into acpi_memory_device_remove(). > > The last version of this patchset is here: > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/3/126 > > Changelos from v1 to v2: > Patch1: use acpi_bus_trim() instead of acpi_bus_remove() > Patch2: new patch, introduce a lock to protect the list > Patch3: remove memory too when type is ACPI_BUS_REMOVAL_NORMAL > Note: I don't send [Patch2-4 v1] in this series because they > are no logical changes in these 3 patches. > > Wen Congyang (2): > acpi,memory-hotplug: call acpi_bus_trim() to remove memory device > acpi,memory-hotplug: introduce a mutex lock to protect the list in > acpi_memory_device > > Yasuaki Ishimatsu (1): > acpi,memory-hotplug : add memory offline code to > acpi_memory_device_remove() > > drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- > 1 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > -- Can you please tell me what kernel is the series supposed to apply to? Is it the current Linus' tree, or linux-next, or something else? Thanks, Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/