Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 3 Sep 2002 19:22:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 3 Sep 2002 19:22:31 -0400 Received: from pc1-cwma1-5-cust128.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.120.128]:17649 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 3 Sep 2002 19:22:29 -0400 Subject: Re: aic7xxx sets CDR offline, how to reset? From: Alan Cox To: Doug Ledford Cc: James Bottomley , "Justin T. Gibbs" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20020903185036.G12201@redhat.com> References: <200209032132.g83LWdD09043@localhost.localdomain> <20020903185036.G12201@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-6) Date: 04 Sep 2002 00:28:47 +0100 Message-Id: <1031095727.21439.47.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 857 Lines: 18 On Tue, 2002-09-03 at 23:50, Doug Ledford wrote: > Hmmm...I thought a big reason for adding REQ_BARRIER was to be able to > support more robust journaling with order requirement verification. If > that's true, then REQ_BARRIER commands could become quite common on disks > using ext3. I doubt it very much because the only way to implement barriers on IDE is fantastically expensive. I'm dubious it makes sense for ext3 to use barriers in that way. All it needs as I understand the rules is that an I/O isnt reported as completed by the device driver before it is on the medium or in a non volatile cache. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/