Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759523Ab2JTBXw (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Oct 2012 21:23:52 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com ([209.85.212.178]:49571 "EHLO mail-wi0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755490Ab2JTBXv (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Oct 2012 21:23:51 -0400 Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 03:23:46 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Rik van Riel Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Andrea Arcangeli , Linux Memory Management List , Mel Gorman , Linux kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: question on NUMA page migration Message-ID: <20121020012345.GA24667@gmail.com> References: <5081777A.8050104@redhat.com> <1350664742.2768.40.camel@twins> <50818A41.7030909@redhat.com> <1350669236.2768.66.camel@twins> <50819CED.30803@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50819CED.30803@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1427 Lines: 45 * Rik van Riel wrote: > On 10/19/2012 01:53 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > >On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 13:13 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote: > > >>Another alternative might be to do the put_page inside > >>do_prot_none_numa(). That would be analogous to do_wp_page > >>disposing of the old page for the caller. > > > >It'd have to be inside migrate_misplaced_page(), can't do before > >isolate_lru_page() or the page might disappear. Doing it after is > >(obviously) too late. > > Keeping an extra refcount on the page might _still_ > result in it disappearing from the process by some > other means, in-between you grabbing the refcount > and invoking migration of the page. > > >>I am not real happy about NUMA migration introducing its own > >>migration mode... > > > >You didn't seem to mind too much earlier, but I can remove it if you > >want. > > Could have been reviewing fatigue :) :-) > And yes, it would have been nice to not have a special > migration mode for sched/numa. > > Speaking of, when do you guys plan to submit a (cleaned up) > version of the sched/numa patch series for review on lkml? Which commit(s) worry you specifically? Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/