Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759544Ab2JTBX7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Oct 2012 21:23:59 -0400 Received: from mail-ie0-f174.google.com ([209.85.223.174]:55365 "EHLO mail-ie0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759529Ab2JTBX4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Oct 2012 21:23:56 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20121019184908.GA19834@phenom.dumpdata.com> References: <1350481786-4969-1-git-send-email-konrad.wilk@oracle.com> <20121017174317.GA25443@phenom.dumpdata.com> <20121019184908.GA19834@phenom.dumpdata.com> Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 21:23:55 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 5OC3HEgsoZ9QHNUNUzWLzum3NVQ Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC] ACPI S3 and Xen (suprisingly small\!). From: Ben Guthro To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1887 Lines: 46 ack. I'm happy to test a 2nd round, if you CC me on any fixed patches (just in case I'm not monitoring lkml / xen-devel on that particular day) On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 02:00:29PM -0400, Ben Guthro wrote: >> I'm not sure it matters, but I'm testing against a changeset about a week old: >> http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=commit;h=1c4a5b37b55c56e49135e65728137f54288d1fe6 > > I was able to reproduce it with Xen 4.2 so found the culprit. > > .. And then another issue :-( > >> >> Plus patches specific to XenClient Enterprise. >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk >> wrote: >> > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 01:46:09PM -0400, Ben Guthro wrote: >> >> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk >> >> wrote: >> >> [...] >> >> >> >> > The end result is this is a nice set of patches where there is only >> >> > _one_ change in the x86 code (and it is just more of dealing with >> >> > error case) - and the rest are all done in Xen side. >> >> >> >> I'm sorry to report that this series doesn't seem to work in my setup >> >> against xen-unstable. >> >> >> >> To verify that it was, in fact this patch series, and not another Xen >> >> regression - I swapped out the kernel with this patch series, with an >> >> identical one, replacing only this series with your acpi-s3.v9 branch >> >> - and everything worked fine. >> > >> > Thanks for testing it! >> > >> > I had tested it with Xen 4.1.3, which could be doing something different. >> > Will see what is up. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/