Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 3 Sep 2002 20:49:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 3 Sep 2002 20:49:10 -0400 Received: from 2-210.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br ([200.193.160.210]:28805 "EHLO 2-210.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 3 Sep 2002 20:49:09 -0400 Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 21:53:27 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: William Lee Irwin III cc: Andrew Morton , lkml , "linux-mm@kvack.org" Subject: Re: 2.5.33-mm1 In-Reply-To: <20020904004028.GS888@holomorphy.com> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1024 Lines: 29 On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, William Lee Irwin III wrote: > count_list() appears to be the largest consumer of cpu after this is > done, or so say the profiles after running updatedb by hand on > 2.5.33-mm1 on a 900MHz P-III T21 Thinkpad with 256MB of RAM. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > Maybe it's old news. Just thought I'd try running a test on something > tiny for once. (new kbd/mouse config options were a PITA BTW) You've got an interesting idea of tiny ;) Somehow I have the idea that the Linux users with 64 MB of RAM or less have _more_ memory together than what's present in all the >8GB Linux servers together... regards, Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/