Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 3 Sep 2002 21:45:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 3 Sep 2002 21:45:21 -0400 Received: from dsl-213-023-043-116.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.43.116]:61849 "EHLO starship") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 3 Sep 2002 21:45:20 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: Rusty Russell , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [TRIVIAL PATCH] Remove list_t infection. Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 03:52:22 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20020904013530.8E1ED2C0D2@lists.samba.org> In-Reply-To: <20020904013530.8E1ED2C0D2@lists.samba.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1044 Lines: 29 On Wednesday 04 September 2002 02:41, Rusty Russell wrote: > In message you > write: > > > > On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Jamie Lokier wrote: > > > > > > 1. struct list > > > 2. struct list_node > > > > > > With these two types, `list_add' et al. can actually _check_ that you > > > got the arguments the right way around. > > > > Well, the thing is, one of the _advantages_ of "struct list_head" is > > exactly the fact that the implementation is 100% agnostic about whether a > > list entry is the head, or just part of the list. > > Excellent. Well I'm glad that's sorted. > > Now please apply my patch (which got sidelined by nomenclature fetishers), Yep, half a frog in the blender is better than no frog. -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/