Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756750Ab2JTTWU (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:22:20 -0400 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:57730 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754446Ab2JTTWU (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:22:20 -0400 Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 21:22:15 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Sooman Jeong <77smart@hanyang.ac.kr> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Initial report on F2FS filesystem performance Message-ID: <20121020192215.GB555@elf.ucw.cz> References: <1350360423154.2800.144.00.1.77smart@hanyang.ac.kr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1350360423154.2800.144.00.1.77smart@hanyang.ac.kr> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 784 Lines: 20 On Tue 2012-10-16 13:07:03, Sooman Jeong wrote: > > This is a brief summary of our initial filesystem performance study of f2fs against existing two filesystems in linux: EXT4, NILFS2, and f2fs. > Hmm, flashes are actually optimized for VFAT, right? Can you compare against that? What about something more complex like "untar of kernel tree"? Ouch and... thanks for doing this. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/