Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753489Ab2JVLxX (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Oct 2012 07:53:23 -0400 Received: from goliath.siemens.de ([192.35.17.28]:17486 "EHLO goliath.siemens.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753412Ab2JVLxW (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Oct 2012 07:53:22 -0400 Message-ID: <50852F9C.9020808@siemens.com> Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 13:35:56 +0200 From: Jan Kiszka User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); de; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080226 SUSE/2.0.0.12-1.1 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gleb Natapov CC: Xiao Guangrong , Avi Kivity , Marcelo Tosatti , LKML , KVM Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: fix vcpu->mmio_fragments overflow References: <5081033C.4060503@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20121022091615.GG29310@redhat.com> <50852972.305@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20121022112314.GO29310@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20121022112314.GO29310@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2226 Lines: 51 On 2012-10-22 13:23, Gleb Natapov wrote: > On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 07:09:38PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote: >> On 10/22/2012 05:16 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote: >>> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 03:37:32PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote: >>>> After commit b3356bf0dbb349 (KVM: emulator: optimize "rep ins" handling), >>>> the pieces of io data can be collected and write them to the guest memory >>>> or MMIO together. >>>> >>>> Unfortunately, kvm splits the mmio access into 8 bytes and store them to >>>> vcpu->mmio_fragments. If the guest uses "rep ins" to move large data, it >>>> will cause vcpu->mmio_fragments overflow >>>> >>>> The bug can be exposed by isapc (-M isapc): >>>> >>>> [23154.818733] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC >>>> [ ......] >>>> [23154.858083] Call Trace: >>>> [23154.859874] [] kvm_get_cr8+0x1d/0x28 [kvm] >>>> [23154.861677] [] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0xcda/0xe45 [kvm] >>>> [23154.863604] [] ? kvm_arch_vcpu_load+0x17b/0x180 [kvm] >>>> >>>> >>>> Actually, we can use one mmio_fragment to store a large mmio access for the >>>> mmio access is always continuous then split it when we pass the mmio-exit-info >>>> to userspace. After that, we only need two entries to store mmio info for >>>> the cross-mmio pages access >>>> >>> I wonder can we put the data into coalesced mmio buffer instead of >> >> If we put all mmio data into coalesced buffer, we should: >> - ensure the userspace program uses KVM_REGISTER_COALESCED_MMIO to register >> all mmio regions. >> > It appears to not be so. > Userspace calls kvm_flush_coalesced_mmio_buffer() after returning from > KVM_RUN which looks like this: Nope, no longer, only on accesses to devices that actually use such regions (and there are only two ATM). The current design of a global coalesced mmio ring is horrible /wrt latency. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SDP-DE Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/