Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 12:59:11 +1100
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Zach Brown <zab@zabbo.net>,
        "Maxim V. Patlasov" <mpatlasov@parallels.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/22] loop: Issue O_DIRECT aio using bio_vec
Message-ID: <20121023015911.GO4291@dastard>
References: <1350918922-6096-1-git-send-email-dave.kleikamp@oracle.com>
 <20121023000733.GG4291@dastard>
 <5085EA94.7000901@oracle.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5085EA94.7000901@oracle.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1907
Lines: 43

On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 07:53:40PM -0500, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
> On 10/22/2012 07:07 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 10:15:00AM -0500, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
> >> This is the current version of the patchset I presented at the LSF-MM
> >> Summit in San Francisco in April. I apologize for letting it go so
> >> long before re-submitting.
> >>
> >> This patchset was begun by Zach Brown and was originally submitted for
> >> review in October, 2009. Feedback was positive, and I have picked up
> >> where he left off, porting his patches to the latest mainline kernel
> >> and adding support more file systems.
> >>
> >> This patch series adds a kernel interface to fs/aio.c so that kernel code can
> >> issue concurrent asynchronous IO to file systems.  It adds an aio command and
> >> file system methods which specify io memory with pages instead of userspace
> >> addresses.
> >>
> >> This series was written to reduce the current overhead loop imposes by
> >> performing synchronus buffered file system IO from a kernel thread.  These
> >> patches turn loop into a light weight layer that translates bios into iocbs.
> > 
> > I note that there is no support for XFS in this patch set. Is there
> > a particular problem that prevents XFS from being converted, or it
> > just hasn't been done?
> 
> It just hasn't been done. It wasn't one of the trivial ones so I put it
> off at first, and after that, it's an oversight. I'll follow up with an
> xfs patch for your review.

Thanks Shaggy, that's all I wanted to know. No extra work for me
(apart from review and testing) is fine by me. ;)

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/