Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 4 Sep 2002 06:51:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 4 Sep 2002 06:51:19 -0400 Received: from pc1-cwma1-5-cust128.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.120.128]:35571 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 4 Sep 2002 06:51:18 -0400 Subject: Re: X.25 Support in Kernel? From: Alan Cox To: hps@intermeta.de Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-6) Date: 04 Sep 2002 11:56:22 +0100 Message-Id: <1031136982.2796.9.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1028 Lines: 20 On Wed, 2002-09-04 at 10:08, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote: > Basically I need to talk to a Cisco router with X.25 protocol and be > able to terminate an X.25 connection in user space in an > application. As far as I can see, there is the easy way talking XOP > with the router or talking X.25 over LLC2 (which Cisco calls CMNS) for > which support seems to be "not yet completely functional". > > Considering the possibility of hacking with the x.25 part of the kernel; > which would be the best way to start with LLC2 support? Using the driver > from linux-sna or hacking with net/llc ? The base kernel llc code is junk. Thats been rewritten by the SNA folks and also used by the netbeui for Linux people. That should give you enough to talk X.25/X.29 over LLC pink book style - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/