Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756940Ab2JWJNK (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Oct 2012 05:13:10 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com ([209.85.212.178]:63889 "EHLO mail-wi0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756733Ab2JWJNH (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Oct 2012 05:13:07 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20121022155028.GA13791@core.coreip.homeip.net> References: <1350911580-20307-1-git-send-email-sourav.poddar@ti.com> <20121022155028.GA13791@core.coreip.homeip.net> Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 11:13:05 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] Input: omap4-keypad: Add pinctrl support From: Linus Walleij To: Sourav Poddar , Dmitry Torokhov Cc: tony@atomide.com, b-cousson@ti.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, Felipe Balbi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1679 Lines: 45 On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > Hi Sourav, > > On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 06:43:00PM +0530, Sourav Poddar wrote: >> Adapt keypad to use pinctrl framework. >> >> Tested on omap4430 sdp with 3.7-rc1 kernel. > > I do not see anything in the driver that would directly use pinctrl. Is > there a better place to select default pin configuration; maybe when > instantiating platform device? The option is to use pinctrl hogs. Then the pins will be taken, muxed and configured by the pin controller itself. Another option (not implemented) is to use bus notifiers. (I wrote about this in some other thread but can't find it now.) Each approach above come with its own set of problems. If the driver need to handle multiple states like default/idle/sleep it is IMO better to put the handling into the driver, so if that is what is going to happen also to this driver it could be a good idea to actually implement that code upfront and include in this submission so as to show that this driver is really going to exercise its pins. But it's also a question of conformity: if other drivers in the system is using different states and this is the only one using a single "default" state, then it doesn't make sense to have just one driver get its pins using hogs, it's just inconsistent. So Sourav, please tell us a bit about your plans for this and other drivers! Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/