Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 4 Sep 2002 14:29:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 4 Sep 2002 14:29:10 -0400 Received: from m86.net195-132-236.noos.fr ([195.132.236.86]:36481 "EHLO zion.wanadoo.fr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 4 Sep 2002 14:29:09 -0400 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: "Martin J. Bligh" , Tom Rini , Craig Arsenault Cc: , Subject: Re: consequences of lowering "MAX_LOW_MEM"? Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 22:28:23 +0200 Message-Id: <20020903202823.7152@192.168.4.1> In-Reply-To: <137715274.1031128333@[10.10.2.3]> References: <137715274.1031128333@[10.10.2.3]> X-Mailer: CTM PowerMail 3.1.2 F MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 779 Lines: 19 >I think you'll find yourself with no virtual address space left to >do vmalloc / fixmap / kmap type stuff. Or at least you would on i386, >I presume it's the same for ppc. Sounds like you may have left >yourself enough space for fixmap & kmap, but any calls to vmalloc >will probably fail ? Yes, same problem on PPC, you'll run out of virtual space quite quickly for vmalloc and ioremap. Stuff a video board with lots of VRAM or any PCI card exposing large MMIO regions into your machines and it will probably not even boot. Ben. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/