Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934165Ab2JWXmb (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Oct 2012 19:42:31 -0400 Received: from mailserver6.natinst.com ([130.164.80.6]:51954 "EHLO spamkiller06.natinst.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933579Ab2JWXm3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Oct 2012 19:42:29 -0400 Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 18:42:19 -0500 From: Josh Cartwright To: Nick Bowler Cc: Arnd Bergmann , arm@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, John Linn Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] zynq: move static peripheral mappings Message-ID: <20121023234219.GM20593@beefymiracle.amer.corp.natinst.com> References: <20121022211219.GC31538@beefymiracle.amer.corp.natinst.com> <201210231450.11540.arnd@arndb.de> <20121023162641.GG20593@beefymiracle.amer.corp.natinst.com> <20121023202703.GA16912@elliptictech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20121023202703.GA16912@elliptictech.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2011-07-01) X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on MailServ58-US/AUS/H/NIC(Release 8.5.3FP2 HF169|September 14, 2012) at 10/23/2012 06:42:14 PM, Serialize by Router on MailServ58-US/AUS/H/NIC(Release 8.5.3FP2 HF169|September 14, 2012) at 10/23/2012 06:42:14 PM, Serialize complete at 10/23/2012 06:42:14 PM Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="iRjOs3ViPWHdlw/I" Content-Disposition: inline X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.7.7855,1.0.431,0.0.0000 definitions=2012-10-23_09:2012-10-23,2012-10-23,1970-01-01 signatures=0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2252 Lines: 62 --iRjOs3ViPWHdlw/I Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 04:27:03PM -0400, Nick Bowler wrote: > > Just FYI, I sent a patch to fix the same bug a while back > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1156361/ > > together with other patches to fix early printk on the ZC702 serial > console. Admittedly, I dropped the ball on these as other issues > came up so I was away from the Zynq for a while. > > However, I'm now getting back on the Zynq and have a bunch of patches to > make it all work on the ZC702 board. I've respun the ZC702 early boot > fixes against newer git but they're obviously going to conflict with > this series. Should I resend them anyway? If you have other fixes for the zc702, that'd be great. Most of my testing has been in a qemu model; I haven't had a chance to try getting the zc702 booting yet. The first stumbling block is that it looks like the secondary uart is the primary uart on the zc702. > I also have a DT binding for the TTC driver, I can send that. That'd be great! Thanks, Josh --iRjOs3ViPWHdlw/I Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQhytbAAoJEEef0niEbw+lINUP/AhwceKvuYTD+LlGq4Dk8D5m lhnmtkIBW1U1KBPLyiKE0DcayLlGgIlSKU/rRYdUAzvzE2x11ztne6AF3qWG2jMq 5vy0rn14utgHrVFrT4/nrsz5oQzUyzmos7qlbotL+YQmxDGzl3Zmc4qSbe9SxoTF Goy79yXLFs9CJ5sI6HlSk7coA5rJ5xvplgaw75b/1Gsc7ut4tLUwFZx8+etOl9hB EmnBHbWFUvQAwDNWmOLKJuS2lDnaloqX699Q7bpEvKAZMtSl10POdg5z+ZgBSW4W DEj181GGawRuzVRjHx37UQ5fwCTcnszv/EriL4+MYBs2YLkubZemA2o8fX3Wd5gk jPIxgR8Hnny/l+I5+jbXBEND7kcrAEbOy3jmbItB4ih4v53XM0F7+pd4D4+1jjmm 9uS7f/hT8gdBLKuIU5B4D3ZCBLcUBOum2Pt03IqDJDiIJEu8ysDDKrysSFJvgXUe p9jnVGDAHsAMkKRToOoTGmFUM4bZWmkxwruu/6UsTDrpPEKK4+DKaG8axoWKydjh 10VrqCGT3GWBz/S407z2RdIkLiYKZh/mpjAUKB8QyV943IRdJhVr3hkI28uj/mrX nvz2z8++sJi8NKA1NJZKSfmCv+wfUufPQNXVEsKp5ed9TPwq4wFfS6FS/VUbQ/0j PNI4lv/imiU0cBG6ZbHR =cBnv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --iRjOs3ViPWHdlw/I-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/