Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758172Ab2JXMKD (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Oct 2012 08:10:03 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.9]:53882 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755618Ab2JXMKB (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Oct 2012 08:10:01 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Josh Cartwright Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] zynq subarch cleanups Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 12:09:58 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/3.5.0; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: arm@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, John Linn , Nick Bowler References: <20121024003218.GA31625@beefymiracle.amer.corp.natinst.com> In-Reply-To: <20121024003218.GA31625@beefymiracle.amer.corp.natinst.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201210241209.58655.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:ajlkjRIPUuQgxFSIDt5xqbXjbluZiVtM0rLv4r/Y4y9 rISSd0yyfyMuqtB9FoCSScaluk7Dkvpsa3i+6KMfDQ2ATHCqw9 nKH5Hk5vO78ey6ONezPfGoU5lUVwrTnVFroJE9hGz2dhiwvj4N 4ODy694LKHDZetCdEGiFnlcPaCYZ3bBdb/9Z9ylsAvrNfKk0j2 S/wEdskt4OZu4GXRN8i/kqSIe/6AkesgyEwc/dQRYnKlqWSx4W tHlMJ6eoWgygQS0rQ3OVSkUCvCuTC6T+6Vi/X732MAeP0A6Ksx MRIOlL3f8oJcOyxkWhNLpigTCOSFykovqKa51xg4jVHm5yLvoG D4hdZ8l8m0OseMeWTCsE= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1594 Lines: 39 On Wednesday 24 October 2012, Josh Cartwright wrote: > Things have been relatively quiet on the Zynq front lately. This patchset does > a bit of cleanup of the Zynq subarchitecture. It was the necessary set of > things I had to do to get a zynq target booting with the upstream qemu model. > > Patches 1 and 2 move zynq to use the GIC and pl310 L2 cache controller device > tree mappings respectively. > > Patch 3 removes unused clock infrastructure. the plan is to rework the > out-of-tree Xilinx generic clk support into something suitable for merging. > What's in tree now just isn't used at all, and can be removed. > > Patch 4 and 5 move around the static peripheral mappings into the vmalloc area. Looks all good to me now. > > I intentionally did not Cc stable on patch 5, even though you had > suggested otherwise. I do not think it will apply cleanly to the stable > trees independent of the other patches. Additionally, with the current > state of zynq upstream, I'm not convinced there would be enough users to > make it worth the effort. Ok, fair enough. > Additionally, I've left the SCU static mapping around, even though its > currently unused. We'll eventually need it around (maybe in a different form) > when SMP support is added. Right. John, are you going to pick up these patches and send a pull request? Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/