Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S315923AbSIDWkY>; Wed, 4 Sep 2002 18:40:24 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S315925AbSIDWkX>; Wed, 4 Sep 2002 18:40:23 -0400
Received: from air-2.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:41744 "EHLO mail.osdl.org")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S315923AbSIDWkX>;
	Wed, 4 Sep 2002 18:40:23 -0400
Message-Id: <200209042244.g84MiqK07015@mail.osdl.org>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4
To: "Paolo Ciarrocchi" <ciarrocchi@linuxmail.org>
cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cliffw@osdl.org
Subject: Re: BYTE Unix Benchmarks Version 3.6 
In-Reply-To: Message from "Paolo Ciarrocchi" <ciarrocchi@linuxmail.org> 
   of "Thu, 05 Sep 2002 06:00:55 +0800." <20020904220055.21349.qmail@linuxmail.org> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2002 15:44:52 -0700
From: Cliff White <cliffw@osdl.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 908
Lines: 28

> Hi all,
> I've just ran the BYTE Unix Benchmarks Version 3.6 on the 2.4.19 and on the 2.5.33 kernel.
> Here it goes the results:
> 
snipped:
Always useful to compare. I think the data from STP show something simular.
I've pulled some reports, rather than send a huge email, here are the URL's
(btw STP runs v4.0.1 UNIXbench) 

 runs made on 2-CPU platform
2.4.19: http://khack.osdl.org/stp/3877/results/report
2.5.33: http://khack.osdl.org/stp/4928/results/report

Another compare...why does pre5 appear a little worse than pre4 ?
2.4.20-pre5: http://khack.osdl.org/stp/4836/results/report
2.4.20-pre4: http://khack.osdl.org/stp/4581/results/report


cliffw




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/