Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1422671Ab2JXWFX (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:05:23 -0400 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.4]:53363 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758782Ab2JXWFU (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:05:20 -0400 Message-ID: <5088661D.20608@web.de> Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 00:05:17 +0200 From: Jannis Achstetter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121022 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Theodore Ts'o" CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6.3 (and other stable branches?) References: <87objupjlr.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> <20121023013343.GB6370@fieldses.org> <87mwzdnuww.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> <20121023143019.GA3040@fieldses.org> <874nllxi7e.fsf_-_@spindle.srvr.nix> <87pq48nbyz.fsf_-_@spindle.srvr.nix> <20121023221913.GC28626@thunk.org> <20121024213129.GB5484@thunk.org> In-Reply-To: <20121024213129.GB5484@thunk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:aDx5cmrwTI29GFfP627PxngSwWdoUcA6StpWmNo8Zeq pFAN3OkAER0m7vi525fFGFVfYawm+xWVWDfZfKhIbAXpTl6YF8 wtsGOXsSP1ihBiP/SVglQmG+hjt8/JREewZDyL+FOjCdQJrBsN EqS/lcEN9AmO5K48XJHBrudXpY6RwHQOuaTnhDWVHyyEkVirwf 4PPFnu4TN0TW1x2PKwQGsueS6KSE60T0q7f5xyuA/U= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1671 Lines: 42 Am 24.10.2012 23:31, schrieb Theodore Ts'o: > On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 09:13:01PM +0200, Jannis Achstetter wrote: >> >> As a "normal linux user" I'm interested in the practical things to do >> now to avoid data loss. I'm running several systems with 3.6.2 and ext4. >> Fearing loss of data: >> - Is there a way to see whether the journal of a specific partition has >> been wrapped (since mounting) so that umounting and mounting (or doing a >> reboot to downgrade the kernel) is safe? > [...] > (Keep in mind this is why commercial software corporations like > [...] > can all work towards finding the best answer.) I really appreciate this and I like it since although the root-cause hasn't been found for sure yet, it is a transparent process. And it's great good thing that we can directly talk to the involved devs w/o going through 200 layers of marketing and spokesmen (as it were with the two companies you mentioned). > It's a little bit too early for this meme: > http://memegenerator.net/instance/28936247 That's a good one :) > But do please note that that Fedora !7 users have been using 3.6.2 for > [...] > with trailing edge kernel sources. :-) Yes, the downside of running Gentoo unstable. But even the "stable" tree used 3.5.7 and this is the one my NAS uses where I do store my backups. Nevertheless, your reply eased my mind to a great extend and I'm thankful for it. Time for bed now :) Jannis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/