Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1946007Ab2JYNe3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Oct 2012 09:34:29 -0400 Received: from mail.free-electrons.com ([88.190.12.23]:34519 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1945936Ab2JYNeZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Oct 2012 09:34:25 -0400 Message-ID: <50893FC8.1050503@free-electrons.com> Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 15:34:00 +0200 From: Gregory CLEMENT User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120912 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Petazzoni CC: Jason Cooper , Andrew Lunn , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Arnd Bergmann , Olof Johansson , Ben Dooks , Ian Molton , Nicolas Pitre , Lior Amsalem , Maen Suleiman , Tawfik Bayouk , Shadi Ammouri , Eran Ben-Avi , Yehuda Yitschak , Nadav Haklai , Ike Pan , Jani Monoses , Chris Van Hoof , Dan Frazier , Leif Lindholm , Jon Masters , David Marlin , Sebastian Hesselbarth , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm: mvebu: adding SATA support: dt binding and config update References: <1351086561-13569-1-git-send-email-gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> <1351086561-13569-3-git-send-email-gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> <20121024160139.6dbf5e16@skate> <5087F5B9.0@free-electrons.com> <20121025131818.GF18811@titan.lakedaemon.net> <20121025152114.73e69c92@skate> In-Reply-To: <20121025152114.73e69c92@skate> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1569 Lines: 49 On 10/25/2012 03:21 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Jason, > > On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 09:18:18 -0400, Jason Cooper wrote: > >>> Jason, Andrew, do you want I split this patch as suggested by >>> Thomas or are you fine with having one single patch? >> >> Yes, please make the defconfig changes a separate patch. Also, please >> make sure only the minimum is enabled (eq RAID... isn't needed). > > I haven't looked in details at the driver, but is nr-ports = the > right way of doing things? We may have platforms were port 0 is not > used, but port 1 is used, and just a number of ports doesn't allow to > express this. > > Shouldn't the DT property be > > ports = <0>, <1> > ports = <1> > ports = <1>, <3> > > In order to allow to more precisely enabled SATA ports? Or maybe the > SATA ports cannot be enabled/disabled on a per-port basis, in which > case I'm obviously wrong here. The actual implementation of mv_sata.c doesn't work like this. You can only pass the number of ports supported not the list of the port you want to support. I've checked in the device tree binding documentation _and_ also in the code. > > Best regards, > > Thomas > -- Gregory Clement, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/