Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 5 Sep 2002 02:27:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 5 Sep 2002 02:27:03 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:64741 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 5 Sep 2002 02:27:02 -0400 Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2002 23:24:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20020904.232425.10994370.davem@redhat.com> To: bof@bof.de Cc: rusty@rustcorp.com.au, ak@suse.de, laforge@gnumonks.org, netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ip_conntrack_hash() problem From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20020905082128.D19551@oknodo.bof.de> References: <20020904152626.A11438@wotan.suse.de> <20020905044436.0772A2C0DF@lists.samba.org> <20020905082128.D19551@oknodo.bof.de> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 654 Lines: 18 From: Patrick Schaaf Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 08:21:28 +0200 B) I despise the (1 << ...htable_bits) construct, used in several places. It's nothing but obfuscation. Please reinstate ...htable_size, and use that, the code will be more readable. You despise, but the processor doesn't. Less data loads means the code goes faster. Franks a lot, David S. Miller davem@redhat.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/