Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 5 Sep 2002 02:43:02 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 5 Sep 2002 02:43:02 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:11238 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 5 Sep 2002 02:43:02 -0400 Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2002 23:40:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20020904.234019.130517085.davem@redhat.com> To: bof@bof.de Cc: rusty@rustcorp.com.au, ak@suse.de, laforge@gnumonks.org, netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ip_conntrack_hash() problem From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20020905083932.F19551@oknodo.bof.de> References: <20020905083340.E19551@oknodo.bof.de> <20020904.233226.108195359.davem@redhat.com> <20020905083932.F19551@oknodo.bof.de> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 551 Lines: 14 From: Patrick Schaaf Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 08:39:32 +0200 Sorry, but I was under the impression that code readability was worth the occasional static-global additional 4 bytes. I must have been mistaken. For the level of readability you're pining for, yes you are mistaken. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/