Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S936085Ab2JYUpl (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Oct 2012 16:45:41 -0400 Received: from smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com ([208.91.2.13]:52313 "EHLO smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935649Ab2JYUpk (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Oct 2012 16:45:40 -0400 From: Dmitry Torokhov To: pv-drivers@vmware.com Cc: Greg KH , Andy King , vm-crosstalk@vmware.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, George Zhang , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [Pv-drivers] [PATCH 04/10] VMCI: device driver implementaton. Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:45:39 -0700 Message-ID: <1635399.c93qq9Svfo@dtor-d630.eng.vmware.com> Organization: VMware, Inc. User-Agent: KMail/4.9.2 (Linux/3.6.0+; KDE/4.9.2; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20121025203148.GA28096@kroah.com> References: <20121025192851.GA26627@kroah.com> <574849395.2604157.1351196160882.JavaMail.root@vmware.com> <20121025203148.GA28096@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1579 Lines: 36 On Thursday, October 25, 2012 01:31:48 PM Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 01:16:00PM -0700, Andy King wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > > > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(vmci_device_get); > > > > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() for this, and all other exports? > > > > We'd prefer to leave them as vanilla exports. While we're committed > > to open-sourcing everything, including our non-upstreamed drivers, > > we don't really have a strong opinion regarding consuming our exports > > in closed-source (general GPL issues aside). > > You can't just say "general GPL issues aside". Honestly, given your > company's prior actions in regards to Linux kernel drivers and the > licenses of them, I don't trust them at all. To help gain that trust > back, marking the exports in this manner will be a great improvement. > > To insist otherwise is to only reinforce my doubts, and reduce my > wanting to even review or accept this code at all. Sorry about that. Huh? What are the concerns exactly? I do not really see difference between EXPORT_SYMBOL() and EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(). The code either derivative of the kernel or it is not and so it either falls under the kernel license or not. >From out perspective we do not really care what other code might use VMCI, all our Linux drivers, even if not all are upstream [yet], are GPL. Thanks, Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/