Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 5 Sep 2002 07:14:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 5 Sep 2002 07:14:00 -0400 Received: from pc-62-30-255-50-az.blueyonder.co.uk ([62.30.255.50]:145 "EHLO kushida.apsleyroad.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 5 Sep 2002 07:13:59 -0400 Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 12:17:17 +0100 From: Jamie Lokier To: Gabriel Paubert Cc: Hirokazu Takahashi , hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: TCP Segmentation Offloading (TSO) Message-ID: <20020905121717.A15540@kushida.apsleyroad.org> References: <20020905.111326.68164898.taka@valinux.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from paubert@iram.es on Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 12:28:23PM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 600 Lines: 16 Gabriel Paubert wrote: > Now that is grossly inefficient ;-) since you can save one instruction by > moving roll after adcl (hand edited partial patch hunk, won't apply): Yes but is it _faster_? :-) I've been doing some PPro assembly lately, and I'm reminded that sometimes inserting instructions can reduce the timing by up to 8 cycles or so. -- Jamie - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/