Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 5 Sep 2002 10:07:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 5 Sep 2002 10:07:30 -0400 Received: from grace.speakeasy.org ([216.254.0.2]:11536 "HELO grace.speakeasy.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 5 Sep 2002 10:07:29 -0400 Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 09:12:06 -0500 (CDT) From: Mike Isely X-X-Sender: isely@grace.speakeasy.net Reply-To: Mike Isely To: "Henning P. Schmiedehausen" cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.4.20-pre5-ac2: Promise Controller LBA48 DMA fixed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1080 Lines: 31 On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote: > Mike Isely writes: > > >The trivial patch at the end of this text fixes DMA w/ LBA48 problems > > More readable would be: > > >- if (!hwif->pci_dev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_PROMISE_20246) { > >+ if (!(hwif->pci_dev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_PROMISE_20246)) { > > if (hwif->pci_dev->device != PCI_DEVICE_ID_PROMISE_20246) { > Yes that is true. But this is Andre's code and it seemed to me to be more important to follow his style. But whatever... -Mike | Mike Isely | PGP fingerprint POSITIVELY NO | | 03 54 43 4D 75 E5 CC 92 UNSOLICITED JUNK MAIL! | isely @ pobox (dot) com | 71 16 01 E2 B5 F5 C1 E8 | (spam-foiling address) | - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/