Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755211Ab2JZKHg (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Oct 2012 06:07:36 -0400 Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:43750 "EHLO opensource.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751881Ab2JZKHf (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Oct 2012 06:07:35 -0400 Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 11:07:31 +0100 From: Dimitris Papastamos To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3 v2] firmware: Add /proc/firmware_path entry to list the firmware paths Message-ID: <20121026100731.GA10468@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1350996776-17864-1-git-send-email-dp@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <1350996776-17864-3-git-send-email-dp@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20121025184833.GA22114@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121025184833.GA22114@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1601 Lines: 40 On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:48:33AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 01:52:55PM +0100, Dimitris Papastamos wrote: > > This patch provides the aforementioned procfs file that lists > > the default firmware paths that are used during firmware lookup. > > > > The file contains a white space separated list of paths. > > Paths can have whitespaces :( > > How about using the "universal" path seperator of ':' that shells are > used to using? Yeah, it gets messy if you have a ':' in a path, but > from what I can tell, only the openSUSE build system does looney things > like that. Sure I can do that, however, could you comment on Ming's comments? Is this patchset something we find useful at the moment as regards listing and/or updating the firmware path list. > > There will be another patch on top of this that adds the functionality > > to modify the paths at runtime. > > Did I miss that patch somewhere? That patch is here: http://opensource.wolfsonmicro.com/~dp/patches/firmware/0004-firmware-Add-write-support-to-proc-fw_path.patch However I've not rebased that patch on top of linux-next and I did not send it for review as it seems that it may be a more sensible solution to pass this as a kernel parameter. Let me know what you think and I'll squeeze some time this weekend to look at this. Thanks, Dimitris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/