Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933201Ab2JZOGV (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Oct 2012 10:06:21 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:9215 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933095Ab2JZOGU (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Oct 2012 10:06:20 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,654,1344236400"; d="scan'208";a="240559301" Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 22:06:07 +0800 From: Yuanhan Liu To: Stefani Seibold Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kfifo: round up the fifo size power of 2 Message-ID: <20121026140607.GB1324@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> References: <1351238218-22648-1-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com> <1351243827.8719.5.camel@wall-e> <20121026123321.GG2778@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> <1351258786.10060.5.camel@wall-e> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1351258786.10060.5.camel@wall-e> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1579 Lines: 41 On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 03:39:46PM +0200, Stefani Seibold wrote: > Am Freitag, den 26.10.2012, 20:33 +0800 schrieb Yuanhan Liu: > > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 11:30:27AM +0200, Stefani Seibold wrote: > > > Am Freitag, den 26.10.2012, 15:56 +0800 schrieb Yuanhan Liu: > > > > Say, if we want to allocate a filo with size of 6 bytes, it would be safer > > > > to allocate 8 bytes instead of 4 bytes. > > > > ---- > > > > I know it works with rounddown_pow_of_two as well, since size is maintained > > > > in the kfifo internal part. But, I'm quite curious why Stefani chose > > > > rounddown_pow_of_two. To reduce memory? > > > > > > > > > > Yes, exactly, if a user do the wrong thing, than the user will get also > > > a wrong result, and did not waste memory. > > > > But, isn't it better to 'correct' it? ;-) > > Both is wrong. This depends on the view. For me it is better to get less > and don't wast space. For example: requesting 1025 will yield in your > case to a fifo which 2048 elements, which requires double of the memory > as expected. > > > > > > > > > But anyway, if the majority like this patch it is okay for me. > > > > Sorry, do you mean you are OK with this patch? > > > > I depends not on me, ask for a democratic decisions. Since you are the original athour, your comments matter :D Thanks, Yuanhan Liu -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/