Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933266Ab2JZOSw (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Oct 2012 10:18:52 -0400 Received: from lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk ([81.2.110.251]:55392 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933147Ab2JZOSu (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Oct 2012 10:18:50 -0400 Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 15:23:44 +0100 From: Alan Cox To: Stefani Seibold Cc: Yuanhan Liu , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kfifo: round up the fifo size power of 2 Message-ID: <20121026152344.4e6053d5@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <1351258786.10060.5.camel@wall-e> References: <1351238218-22648-1-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com> <1351243827.8719.5.camel@wall-e> <20121026123321.GG2778@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> <1351258786.10060.5.camel@wall-e> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.8; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 708 Lines: 18 IMHO absent any reason to make the allocation change we should keep the existing behaviour. Absent any reason to fiddle with the code we should leave it alone. It's delicate, tricky, tiny and works. Don't fiddle. For the size question if the default behaviour is to pack them in then a caller can do their own padding if they want it, for the reverse case you propose as a change this ceases to be true. Thus I would say the current API is right anyway. Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/