Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 5 Sep 2002 14:58:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 5 Sep 2002 14:58:05 -0400 Received: from carisma.slowglass.com ([195.224.96.167]:17671 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 5 Sep 2002 14:58:04 -0400 Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 20:02:40 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lord@sgi.com Subject: Re: 2.4.20pre5aa1 Message-ID: <20020905200240.A12253@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Andrea Arcangeli , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lord@sgi.com References: <20020904233528.GA1238@dualathlon.random> <20020905134414.A1784@infradead.org> <20020905165307.GC1254@dualathlon.random> <20020905180904.A8406@infradead.org> <20020905184125.GA1657@dualathlon.random> <20020905194649.A11789@infradead.org> <20020905185917.GG1657@dualathlon.random> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20020905185917.GG1657@dualathlon.random>; from andrea@suse.de on Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 08:59:17PM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 680 Lines: 16 On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 08:59:17PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > I think we should take the XFS-specific inode lock around vmtruncate. > > Need to double-check with Steve. > > this is the function I'm looking at and it's called with xfs specific > inode lock, and I don't see it grabbed either before calling vmtruncate: should != do we either need to use your accessors for i_size or take the XFS inode lock around vmtruncate. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/