Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 5 Sep 2002 16:22:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 5 Sep 2002 16:22:33 -0400 Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.130.16]:61116 "EHLO pat.uio.no") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 5 Sep 2002 16:22:33 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15735.48664.951983.418842@charged.uio.no> Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 22:27:04 +0200 To: Andrew Morton Cc: Chuck Lever , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: invalidate_inode_pages in 2.5.32/3 In-Reply-To: <3D77BB7C.5F20939F@zip.com.au> References: <3D77A22A.DC3F4D1@zip.com.au> <3D77ADC3.938C09F8@zip.com.au> <3D77BB7C.5F20939F@zip.com.au> X-Mailer: VM 7.00 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no From: Trond Myklebust Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 713 Lines: 20 >>>>> " " == Andrew Morton writes: > It's a bit worrisome if NFS is dependent upon successful > pagecache takedown in invalidate_inode_pages. Why? We don't use all that buffer crap, so in principle invalidate_inode_page() is only supposed to fail for us if - page is locked (i.e. new read in progress or something like that) - page is refcounted (by something like mmap()). neither of which should be the case here. Cheers, Trond - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/