Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753405Ab2J2HZX (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Oct 2012 03:25:23 -0400 Received: from [65.55.88.11] ([65.55.88.11]:10365 "EHLO tx2outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750942Ab2J2HZW convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Oct 2012 03:25:22 -0400 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:62.221.5.235;KIP:(null);UIP:(null);IPV:NLI;H:xir-gw1;RD:unknown-62-221-5-235.ipspace.xilinx.com;EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: 13 X-BigFish: VPS13(zz1454I1432I1418I4015Izz1202h1d1ah1d2ahzzz30ih95h668h839h944hd24hf0ah119dh1220h1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh1307i1155h) From: Michal Simek To: Josh Cartwright , "arm@kernel.org" CC: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , John Linn , Nick Bowler , Arnd Bergmann Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 0/5] zynq subarch cleanups Thread-Topic: [PATCH v4 0/5] zynq subarch cleanups Thread-Index: AQHNtWmr0RZRheffW0uxuGWIfit9cJfP4Hrw Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 07:24:16 +0000 References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.21.26.33] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 X-RCIS-Action: ALLOW Message-ID: <5c2911d7-f753-4d9f-b8d8-3bf011d58e52@TX2EHSMHS014.ehs.local> X-OriginatorOrg: xilinx.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1279 Lines: 35 Hi Josh, Michal- > > Here is a v5 of the zynq cleanup patchset that addresses your feedback. I've > intentionally left patches 4 and 5 in the set until we figure out the appropriate > way to get them in tree (feel free to just apply 1-3) I am ok to pick just several patches from your patchset. But this is no definitely good working style. Not expert for submission process but I think that if there is one broken patch maintainer shouldn't apply it. Can someone else check this? > I've also moved the uart mapping in patch 5 to a known working address, until > we can work out what is happening there. This should allow this patchset to be > applied and have the zc702 boot. Will look at it and apply if works. > You had suggested removing/renaming the zynq-ep107.dts; it wasn't clear > whether you had wanted that in this patchset or not. I'm going to assume not. > I'll follow up with this, after this patchset is applied, if that works for you. Not in this patchset. Sure feel free to send it. Thanks, Michal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/