Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 21 Dec 2000 18:30:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 21 Dec 2000 18:30:01 -0500 Received: from [199.239.160.155] ([199.239.160.155]:46341 "EHLO tenchi.datarithm.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 21 Dec 2000 18:29:52 -0500 Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 15:08:45 -0800 From: Robert Read To: Rik van Riel Cc: Sourav Sen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Wiring down Pages Message-ID: <20001221150845.I24558@tenchi.datarithm.net> Mail-Followup-To: Rik van Riel , Sourav Sen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from riel@conectiva.com.br on Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 06:46:33PM -0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 06:46:33PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote: > > page_cache_drop(page); <= removes your extra count I can't find that function, do you mean page_cache_free() and page_cache_release(), both are aliases for __free_page(). Maybe we need another alias. :) Should non-page cache related code use get_page() and __free_page() directly? Or should the page_cache_* macros be used everywhere? robert - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/