Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 15:38:23 +0100
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@gmail.com>,
        Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>,
        Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>,
        David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
        Hirokazu Takata <takata@linux-m32r.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
        Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>, Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org>,
        Richard Kuo <rkuo@codeaurora.org>, Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@gmail.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>, Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>,
        Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>,
        Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
        Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>
Subject: Re: [update] Re: new execve/kernel_thread design
Message-ID: <20121029153823.2317fdef@mschwide>
In-Reply-To: <20121029132521.GW2616@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
References: <20121016223508.GR2616@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
	<20121026183107.GQ2616@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
	<20121029085339.0ea11bc6@mschwide>
	<20121029132521.GW2616@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Organization: IBM Corporation
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1035
Lines: 32

On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 13:25:21 +0000
Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 08:53:39AM +0100, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> 
> > Oops, sorry. I tested this weeks ago but it seems I never wrote a mail to
> > indicate success. The current git kernel works just fine.
> 
> "Current git" being what?  Linus' tree?  linux-next?  signal.git#arch-s390?
> FWIW, the relevant diff against mainline is below, linux-next already
> contains it.

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/signal arch-s390

against Linux 3.7-rc3

# uname -a
Linux r3545014 3.7.0-rc3-00002-g95a96a7 #1 SMP Mon Oct 29 15:32:18 CET 2012 s390x s390x s390x GNU/Linux

works as it is. Feel free to add my Acked-By.

-- 
blue skies,
   Martin.

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/