Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932584Ab2J2Pxr (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Oct 2012 11:53:47 -0400 Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([222.73.24.84]:20672 "EHLO song.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759857Ab2J2PsS (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Oct 2012 11:48:18 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,673,1344182400"; d="scan'208";a="6093341" From: Lai Jiangshan To: Mel Gorman , David Rientjes , LKML , x86 maintainers Cc: Jiang Liu , Rusty Russell , Yinghai Lu , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Yasuaki ISIMATU , Andrew Morton , Lai Jiangshan , KOSAKI Motohiro , Christoph Lameter , linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: [V5 PATCH 26/26] mempolicy: fix is_valid_nodemask() Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 23:21:16 +0800 Message-Id: <1351524078-20363-25-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.4.4 In-Reply-To: <1351523301-20048-1-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <1351523301-20048-1-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on mailserver/fnst(Release 8.5.3|September 15, 2011) at 2012/10/29 23:19:59, Serialize by Router on mailserver/fnst(Release 8.5.3|September 15, 2011) at 2012/10/29 23:20:00, Serialize complete at 2012/10/29 23:20:00 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2805 Lines: 85 is_valid_nodemask() is introduced by 19770b32. but it does not match its comments, because it does not check the zone which > policy_zone. Also in b377fd, this commits told us, if highest zone is ZONE_MOVABLE, we should also apply memory policies to it. so ZONE_MOVABLE should be valid zone for policies. is_valid_nodemask() need to be changed to match it. Fix: check all zones, even its zoneid > policy_zone. Use nodes_intersects() instead open code to check it. Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan Reported-by: Wen Congyang --- mm/mempolicy.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c index d4a084c..ed7c249 100644 --- a/mm/mempolicy.c +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c @@ -140,19 +140,7 @@ static const struct mempolicy_operations { /* Check that the nodemask contains at least one populated zone */ static int is_valid_nodemask(const nodemask_t *nodemask) { - int nd, k; - - for_each_node_mask(nd, *nodemask) { - struct zone *z; - - for (k = 0; k <= policy_zone; k++) { - z = &NODE_DATA(nd)->node_zones[k]; - if (z->present_pages > 0) - return 1; - } - } - - return 0; + return nodes_intersects(*nodemask, node_states[N_MEMORY]); } static inline int mpol_store_user_nodemask(const struct mempolicy *pol) @@ -1572,6 +1560,26 @@ struct mempolicy *get_vma_policy(struct task_struct *task, return pol; } +static int apply_policy_zone(struct mempolicy *policy, enum zone_type zone) +{ + enum zone_type dynamic_policy_zone = policy_zone; + + BUG_ON(dynamic_policy_zone == ZONE_MOVABLE); + + /* + * if policy->v.nodes has movable memory only, + * we apply policy when gfp_zone(gfp) = ZONE_MOVABLE only. + * + * policy->v.nodes is intersect with node_states[N_MEMORY]. + * so if the following test faile, it implies + * policy->v.nodes has movable memory only. + */ + if (!nodes_intersects(policy->v.nodes, node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY])) + dynamic_policy_zone = ZONE_MOVABLE; + + return zone >= dynamic_policy_zone; +} + /* * Return a nodemask representing a mempolicy for filtering nodes for * page allocation @@ -1580,7 +1588,7 @@ static nodemask_t *policy_nodemask(gfp_t gfp, struct mempolicy *policy) { /* Lower zones don't get a nodemask applied for MPOL_BIND */ if (unlikely(policy->mode == MPOL_BIND) && - gfp_zone(gfp) >= policy_zone && + apply_policy_zone(policy, gfp_zone(gfp)) && cpuset_nodemask_valid_mems_allowed(&policy->v.nodes)) return &policy->v.nodes; -- 1.7.4.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/