Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754204Ab2J3Aqn (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Oct 2012 20:46:43 -0400 Received: from mail-da0-f46.google.com ([209.85.210.46]:39335 "EHLO mail-da0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750875Ab2J3Aql (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Oct 2012 20:46:41 -0400 Message-ID: <508F2354.3090801@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:46:12 +1100 From: Ryan Mallon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121011 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Krzysztof Halasa CC: Arnd Bergmann , Linus Torvalds , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, lkml , arm@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PULL REQ] IXP4xx changes for Linux 3.7 References: <201210142002.55841.arnd@arndb.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2014 Lines: 47 On 18/10/12 09:01, Krzysztof Halasa wrote: > Hi, > > > Unfortunately, as I already explained to you in > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/29/37, my resources for IXP4xx are very > limited (and this isn't a paid job) and I'm in no way able to do what > you require. This, coupled with my inability to make the patches end up > upstream any other way, will make me post relevant MAINTAINERS changes > shortly. > > Don't get me wrong. If I had time for this it could be different. > Unfortunately IXP4xx is a legacy arch, and for me it's simply a hobby at > this point. Given the raised barriers to participate, probably aimed at > paid maintainers, I have to quit doing this. > > BTW since Imre has probably even much less time, it would be a good time > to find someone to maintain IXP4xx code. I will be publishing (from time > to time) my tree (I'm using the hw myself), so even simple > cherry-picking would probably make some sense. I maintain a tree for the ep93xx, which is another legacy arm soc. I also do this as a hobbyist, not as a paid position. Pushing patches to mainline via arm-soc has been very easy. Basically I branch from Linus's tree (typically 3.x-rc1), apply patches to one of a bunch of branches (-devel, -fixes, etc) and then send pull requests to the arm-soc maintainers prior to the merge window. I also have a aggregate branch which is tested in next. It takes very little of my time to maintain this tree. I cannot see how it could be any harder than sending to Linus directly. Also, the arm-soc maintainers, Arnd and Olof, have been very helpful in getting me started with my maintainer tree, and in learning the development flow. I would also rather get flamed by the arm-soc guys than Linus when I make a mistake :-). ~Ryan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/