Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758737Ab2J3P2Z (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:28:25 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:44114 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751149Ab2J3P2Y (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:28:24 -0400 Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 08:28:10 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Mel Gorman Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Rik van Riel , Andrea Arcangeli , Johannes Weiner , Thomas Gleixner , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/31] numa/core patches Message-Id: <20121030082810.b9576441.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20121030122032.GC3888@suse.de> References: <20121025121617.617683848@chello.nl> <20121030122032.GC3888@suse.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.7.1 (GTK+ 2.18.9; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 742 Lines: 19 On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 12:20:32 +0000 Mel Gorman wrote: > ... Useful testing - thanks. Did I miss the description of what autonumabench actually does? How representitive is it of real-world things? > I also expect autonuma is continually scanning where as schednuma is > reacting to some other external event or at least less frequently scanning. Might this imply that autonuma is consuming more CPU in kernel threads, the cost of which didn't get included in these results? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/