Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964847Ab2J3QZn (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Oct 2012 12:25:43 -0400 Received: from mail-vb0-f46.google.com ([209.85.212.46]:47730 "EHLO mail-vb0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964804Ab2J3QZm (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Oct 2012 12:25:42 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1351612350.8467.104.camel@gandalf.local.home> References: <1351611301-3520-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <1351612350.8467.104.camel@gandalf.local.home> Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 17:25:41 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] irq_work: A couple fixes From: Frederic Weisbecker To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Peter Zijlstra , LKML , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Andrew Morton , Paul Gortmaker Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1352 Lines: 34 2012/10/30 Steven Rostedt : > On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 16:34 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: >> Hi, > >> And I still wonder if cpu_relax() is enough to prevent the compiler >> from correctly reloading work->flags in irq_work_sync() loop. >> Do we need ACCESS_ONCE()? > > You mean this loop: > > flags = work->flags & ~IRQ_WORK_PENDING; > for (;;) { > nflags = flags | IRQ_WORK_FLAGS; > oflags = cmpxchg(&work->flags, flags, nflags); > if (oflags == flags) > break; > if (oflags & IRQ_WORK_PENDING) > return false; > flags = oflags; > cpu_relax(); > } > > After the first loading of work->flags, you are worried about the > &work->flags in the cmpxchg()? The cmpxchg() will handle that itself. I > don't see any place that a ACCESS_ONCE() is required here. The cmpxchg() > acts on the address of work->flags, the compiler isn't involved with the > value at that address. No I was worried about the cpu_relax() in irq_work_sync() -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/