Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 00:16:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 00:16:35 -0400 Received: from e35.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.133]:42183 "EHLO e35.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 00:16:35 -0400 Message-ID: <1031286047.3d782d1f27162@imap.linux.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 21:20:47 -0700 From: Nivedita Singhvi To: "David S. Miller" Cc: hadi@cyberus.ca, tcw@tempest.prismnet.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000 References: <1031283490.3d7823228d9ed@imap.linux.ibm.com> <20020905.205842.127265672.davem@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20020905.205842.127265672.davem@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.0 X-Originating-IP: 9.65.33.25 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 946 Lines: 28 Quoting "David S. Miller" : > > ifconfig -a and netstat -rn would also be nice to have.. > > TSO gets turned off during retransmits/SACK and the card does not > do > retransmits. > > Can we move on in this conversation now? :-) Sure :). The motivation for seeing the stats though would be to get an idea of how much retransmission/SACK etc activity _is_ occurring during Troy's SpecWeb runs, which would give us an idea of how often we're actually doing segmentation offload, and better idea of how much gain its possible to further get from this(ahem) DMA coalescing :). Some of Troy's early runs had a very large number of packets dropped by the card. thanks, Nivedita - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/