Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 06:13:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 06:13:24 -0400 Received: from 166.Red-80-36-134.pooles.rima-tde.net ([80.36.134.166]:64295 "EHLO apocalipsis") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 06:13:24 -0400 Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 12:19:29 +0200 From: "Juan M. de la Torre" To: Ingo Molnar Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Little bug in O(1) scheduler patch (also in 2.4.19-ac4) Message-ID: <20020906101929.GA265@apocalipsis> References: <20020906083254.GA769@apocalipsis> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 667 Lines: 20 I was wrong; the problem i was experimenting was due to a symbolic link problem (i was compiling the module with other kernel headers). Since the CRC of a versioned symbol is based on the function arguments i thought that the different type of the argument (well, is the same type with different name) has something to do with the error i was getting. I apologize for wasting readers' time. Regards, Juanma -- /jm - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/