Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756623Ab2JaDYq (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Oct 2012 23:24:46 -0400 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:59193 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751944Ab2JaDYo (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Oct 2012 23:24:44 -0400 Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 03:24:31 +0000 From: Al Viro To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Steven Rostedt , Sasha Levin , Tejun Heo , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, davem@davemloft.net, mingo@elte.hu, ebiederm@xmission.com, aarcange@redhat.com, ericvh@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, josh@joshtriplett.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, axboe@kernel.dk, agk@redhat.com, dm-devel@redhat.com, neilb@suse.de, ccaulfie@redhat.com, teigland@redhat.com, Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com, bfields@fieldses.org, fweisbec@gmail.com, jesse@nicira.com, venkat.x.venkatsubra@oracle.com, ejt@redhat.com, snitzer@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, dev@openvswitch.org, rds-devel@oss.oracle.com, lw@cn.fujitsu.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 01/16] hashtable: introduce a small and naive hashtable Message-ID: <20121031032431.GG2616@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <1351622772-16400-1-git-send-email-levinsasha928@gmail.com> <20121030214257.GB2681@htj.dyndns.org> <1351646186.4004.41.camel@gandalf.local.home> <20121031022418.GE2616@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2000 Lines: 38 On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 07:48:19PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Al Viro wrote: > > > > BTW, how serious have you been back at KS when you were talking about > > pull requests killing a thousand of lines of code being acceptable > > at any point in the cycle? > > Well... I'm absolutely a lot more open to pull requests that kill code > than not, but I have to admit to being a bit more worried about stuff > like your execve/fork patches that touch very low-level code. > > So I think I'll punt that for 3.8 anyway. Oh, well... there go my blackmail plans ;-) Seriously, though, I'm at loss regarding several embedded architectures - arch/score, in particular, seems to be completely orphaned. As far as I can see, it's * abandoned by hw vendor (seems like they were planning to push it game consoles, but that was just before the recession, and...) * abandoned by primary maintainer, who isn't employed by said hw vendor anymore, so his old address had been bouncy for several years. He had bothered to update it in gcc tree, but hadn't been active there either for almost as long. And new address in gcc tree is of form +gcc@gmail.com, so using it for kernel-related mail would seem to be a lousy idea. * the second maintainer seems to be nearly MIA as well - all I can find is Acked-by on one commit. Cc'ed on the kernel_execve() thread, but... no signs of life whatsoever. * a lot of asm glue is in "apparently never worked" state, starting with ptrace hookup (it's clearly started its life as a mips clone, but uses different registers for passing return value, etc. TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE side of that thing still assumes MIPS ABI *and* is suffering obvious bitrot) Sigh... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/