Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934943Ab2JaDtP (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Oct 2012 23:49:15 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f42.google.com ([74.125.82.42]:51245 "EHLO mail-wg0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756536Ab2JaDtN (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Oct 2012 23:49:13 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20121031032431.GG2616@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <1351622772-16400-1-git-send-email-levinsasha928@gmail.com> <20121030214257.GB2681@htj.dyndns.org> <1351646186.4004.41.camel@gandalf.local.home> <20121031022418.GE2616@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20121031032431.GG2616@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 20:48:51 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 2ARbhLXHunNig-ySM8I4e1qWeRw Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 01/16] hashtable: introduce a small and naive hashtable To: Al Viro Cc: Steven Rostedt , Sasha Levin , Tejun Heo , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, davem@davemloft.net, mingo@elte.hu, ebiederm@xmission.com, aarcange@redhat.com, ericvh@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, josh@joshtriplett.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, axboe@kernel.dk, agk@redhat.com, dm-devel@redhat.com, neilb@suse.de, ccaulfie@redhat.com, teigland@redhat.com, Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com, bfields@fieldses.org, fweisbec@gmail.com, jesse@nicira.com, venkat.x.venkatsubra@oracle.com, ejt@redhat.com, snitzer@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, dev@openvswitch.org, rds-devel@oss.oracle.com, lw@cn.fujitsu.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 868 Lines: 21 On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Al Viro wrote: > > Oh, well... there go my blackmail plans ;-) Seriously, though, I'm at loss > regarding several embedded architectures - arch/score, in particular, > seems to be completely orphaned. Don't worry about it. Do a best-effort, and if nobody ever reacts about some odd-ball architecture, whatever. We won't start deleting architectures over something like this, but it might be another sign down the road that some arch code can be removed entirely. So it's not arch/score I'd worry about. It's all the *other* architectures.. Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/