Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 08:40:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 08:40:19 -0400 Received: from mg03.austin.ibm.com ([192.35.232.20]:9700 "EHLO mg03.austin.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 08:40:18 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Dave Kleikamp To: Axel Siebenwirth , Christoph Hellwig , JFS-Discussion , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [OOPS:2.5.33] Re: [Jfs-discussion] crash with JFS assert Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 07:44:43 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.4] Cc: rml@tech9.net, akpm@zip.com.au References: <20020906010641.A24706@infradead.org> <20020906001602.GA393@prester.freenet.de> In-Reply-To: <20020906001602.GA393@prester.freenet.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <200209060744.43231.shaggy@austin.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 920 Lines: 26 On Thursday 05 September 2002 19:16, Axel Siebenwirth wrote: > Aaaah! I got it. I just wanted to write an email expressing that for > some strange reason latest 2.4 kernels (2.4.19-ac4, > 2.4.20-pre5+latest ACPI) work without a problem. > You know what the difference to my 2.5 kernels is..... CONFIG_PREEMPT > is not enabled with my 2.4 kernels but with 2.5 it is! > > Here we go. > > Maybe someone can now get an idea on what the problem is and maybe > how to fix it?! Okay, I haven't played around with CONFIG_PREEMPT. I probably won't get to it until Monday, but I'll see if I can reproduce this one now. Thanks, Shaggy -- David Kleikamp IBM Linux Technology Center - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/