Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 09:18:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 09:18:43 -0400 Received: from 2-210.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br ([200.193.160.210]:18129 "EHLO 2-210.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 09:18:43 -0400 Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 10:22:43 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: "Peter T. Breuer" cc: Anton Altaparmakov , Daniel Phillips , Alexander Viro , Xavier Bestel , , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: (fwd) Re: [RFC] mount flag "direct" In-Reply-To: <200209060917.g869H5c08220@oboe.it.uc3m.es> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 961 Lines: 30 On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Peter T. Breuer wrote: > suppose that I make the FS twice as slow as before by meddling with > it to make it sharable > > then I simply share it among 4 nodes to get a two times _speed up_ > overall. > > That's the basic idea. Details left to reader. The "detail" is lock contention. If you lock the filesystem and invalidate the caches you'll be able to do one operation every disk seek, across all nodes. Chances are your 4-node system would have lower aggregate throughput than a single node system. Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ Spamtraps of the month: september@surriel.com trac@trac.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/