Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 11:14:02 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 11:14:02 -0400 Received: from blackbird.intercode.com.au ([203.32.101.10]:54289 "EHLO blackbird.intercode.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 11:14:01 -0400 Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2002 01:18:03 +1000 (EST) From: James Morris To: Kirk Reiser cc: Alan Cox , Subject: Re: 2.5.xx kernels won't run on my Athlon boxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 935 Lines: 26 On 6 Sep 2002, Kirk Reiser wrote: > I can't be the only person experiencing this. I'm not sure if this is related, but I've noticed a major performance issue starting in 2.5.32 (and still present in .33) on a dual celeron system that has otherwise been working fine for a couple of years with all kinds of bleeding edge kenels. Some initial profiling output is showing up to a factor of 10x the number of clock ticks and load for kernel compiles and local copying of kernel trees. hdparm -t is showing a 25% decrease in throughput. This is an IDE system with a PIIX4 controller. If time permits, I'll do some more investigation. - James -- James Morris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/