Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935930Ab2JaVhM (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:37:12 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f46.google.com ([209.85.220.46]:61585 "EHLO mail-pa0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933664Ab2JaVhH (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:37:07 -0400 From: Dmitry Torokhov To: Tejun Heo Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: introduce managed input devices (add devres support) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 14:37:01 -0700 Message-ID: <5132958.JXBGbd4rj1@dtor-d630.eng.vmware.com> User-Agent: KMail/4.9.2 (Linux/3.7.0-rc3+; KDE/4.9.2; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20121031210532.GX2945@htj.dyndns.org> References: <20121023053513.GA15642@core.coreip.homeip.net> <20121031210532.GX2945@htj.dyndns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1698 Lines: 43 On Wednesday, October 31, 2012 02:05:32 PM Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, Dmitry. > > On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 10:35:14PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > There is a demand from driver's writers to use managed devices framework > > for their drivers. Unfortunately up to this moment input devices did not > > provide support for managed devices and that lead to mixing two styles > > of resource management which usually introduced more bugs, such as > > manually unregistering input device but relying in devres to free > > interrupt handler which (unless device is properly shut off) can cause > > ISR to reference already freed memory. > > > > This change introduces devm_input_allocate_device() that will allocate > > managed instance of input device so that driver writers who prefer > > using devm_* framework do not have to mix 2 styles. > > It generally looks good to me although it's a bit unusual to use > devres on device. Given the way input_dev is used, it probably makes > sense, I guess. > > One thing tho. If possible and there aren't too many, wouldn't it be > better to convert all to use devres. Having two different lifetime > fules tends to lead to gotchas. Not all drivers use devres for rest of their resources so it makes sense to have unmanaged versions (like we have request_irq/devm_request_irq). Besides: [dtor@dtor-ws vmci]$ grep -r input_allocate_device drivers/ | wc -l 298 so I'd rather not ;) Thanks. -- Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/