Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 14:37:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 14:37:26 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:61062 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 14:37:25 -0400 Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 11:34:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20020906.113448.07697441.davem@redhat.com> To: gh@us.ibm.com Cc: Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com, hadi@cyberus.ca, tcw@tempest.prismnet.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com, niv@us.ibm.com Subject: Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000 From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: References: <20020906.103717.82432404.davem@redhat.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 822 Lines: 24 From: Gerrit Huizenga Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 11:19:11 -0700 And, honestly, I'm a kernel guy much more than an applications guy, so I'll admit that I'm not up to speed on what Tux2 can do with dynamic content. TUX can optimize dynamic content just fine. The last I knew was that it could pass it off to another server. Not true. The problem is that performance on Apache sucks but people like the features. Tux's design allows it to be a drop in acceleration method which does not require you to relinquish Apache's feature set. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/